Low­er Oder Val­ley Nation­al Park is an oppor­tu­ni­ty for the region

An amend­ment to the Nation­al Park Act of 1995, which has been repeat­ed­ly request­ed, in par­tic­u­lar the draft amend­ment pre­sent­ed by Bischoff and Wiebke (Mem­ber of the Bun­destag), is being approved by the Asso­ci­a­tion of Friends of the Ger­­man-Pol­ish Euro­pean Nation­al Park “Unteres Oder­tal” e. V. decid­ed­ly reject­ed. The deputy chair­man of the board, Dr. Ans­gar Vössing:

“The Low­er Oder Val­ley Nation­al Park is far too good to be sold off in the begin­ning of the elec­tion cam­paign tumult. The struc­tural­ly weak, increas­ing­ly mate­ri­al­ly and per­son­al­ly drain­ing Uck­er­mark will lose one of its last chances if it con­tin­ues to dis­man­tle the only nation­al park in Bran­den­burg, the only flood­plain nation­al park in Ger­many, instead of devel­op­ing it into an out­stand­ing tourist mag­net. A weak­en­ing and dilu­tion of the Nation­al Park Act of 1995 would make Bran­den­burg look ridicu­lous, and it would also destroy one of the best-known and most suc­cess­ful projects ini­ti­at­ed by the then Envi­ron­ment Min­is­ter Platzeck, now Prime Minister.

The Nation­al Park Act of 1995 was a dif­fi­cult com­pro­mise, an attempt to bal­ance the inter­ests of nature con­ser­va­tion­ists and users. The result was a long, not always con­vinc­ing law, which at least rep­re­sents a basis for future devel­op­ment. The only sub­stan­tial restric­tion that this law pro­vides — all oth­er restric­tions were left to treat­ment guide­lines, which should have been in force in 1998, but not all have been in force to date — is now to be delet­ed accord­ing to the pro­pos­als of Bischoff and Wiebke , that is, no more total reser­va­tions are shown. In addi­tion, the already very weak posi­tion of the nation­al park admin­is­tra­tion will be reduced to prac­ti­cal­ly zero. Hunt­ing, fish­ing and angling should con­tin­ue as usu­al and as usu­al with­out restrictions.

Such an amend­ment would be the end of the only nation­al park in Bran­den­burg, all that would remain is the shell, i.e. only the name. Although it is effec­tive in adver­tis­ing, it would then be mean­ing­less and an irre­spon­si­ble fraud­u­lent label that our asso­ci­a­tion, like all nature con­ser­va­tion­ists, has to reject.

The Asso­ci­a­tion of Friends of the Ger­­man-Pol­ish Euro­pean Nation­al Park Unteres Oder­tal e. V. will con­tin­ue to work in accor­dance with the statutes for a real nation­al park that deserves this name, i.e. a nation­al park accord­ing to IUCN Cat­e­go­ry II. But even if the Bran­den­burg state par­lia­ment weak­ens or abol­ish­es the nation­al park, the asso­ci­a­tion will con­tin­ue its work in accor­dance with its grant deci­sions and the main­te­nance and devel­op­ment plan. ”