Nation­al park oppo­nents meet with themselves
Bischoff’s loca­tion con­fer­ence as a funer­al for the nation­al park!

The future con­fer­ence called by the self-appoint­ed bish­op of the Uck­er­mark unites all oppo­nents of the nation­al park, but does not lead to an open and hon­est dis­cus­sion with all those con­cerned and involved, and cer­tain­ly not to solve pend­ing ques­tions. A solu­tion with­out the nature con­ser­va­tion and envi­ron­men­tal pro­tec­tion asso­ci­a­tions is dif­fi­cult to imag­ine; a solu­tion with­out the affect­ed prop­er­ty own­ers is doomed to fail­ure from the out­set. So you stay among your­self at the future con­fer­ence, mutu­al­ly rein­force your own opin­ions, which are already estab­lished. We don’t want to dis­turb any fur­ther. The chance for dia­logue has once again been missed.

The Asso­ci­a­tion of Friends of the Ger­­man-Pol­ish Euro­pean Nation­al Park Unteres Oder­tal e. V. speaks out against the planned amend­ment of the Nation­al Park Act, which with­out ques­tion would only lead to a fur­ther weak­en­ing and soft­en­ing of the already mod­er­ate pro­tec­tion sta­tus. Instead, the asso­ci­a­tion demands the con­sis­tent imple­men­ta­tion of the Nation­al Park Act and the main­te­nance and devel­op­ment plan. To this end, the state of Bran­den­burg must oper­ate an active fund­ing pol­i­cy specif­i­cal­ly for the nation­al park, espe­cial­ly for local agriculture.

There are moments in life when you have to decide: Either you want a nation­al park, then you have to imple­ment it con­sis­tent­ly in sen­si­ble steps or you lack the will, the strength or the courage to do so, then you should be hon­est and instead cre­ate a bios­phere reserve or a nature park. We firm­ly reject a fraud­u­lent label.

 

Thomas Berg
CEO