No need for amendment

In view of the renewed on-site broad­cast on the sub­ject of “Nation­al Park” in Schwedt on Novem­ber 13, 2003, the chair­man of the board of the Asso­ci­a­tion of Friends of the Ger­­man-Pol­ish Euro­pean Nation­al Park Unteres Oder­tal e. V., Thomas Berg:

“There is cur­rent­ly no rea­son to amend the Nation­al Park Act from 1995. Although the exten­sive law is soft and inde­ter­mi­nate, it does at least pro­vide the frame­work in which the devel­op­ment of the Low­er Oder Val­ley should take place. The region thus has a clear future per­spec­tive, the only nation­al park in Bran­den­burg for its devel­op­ment at least plan­ning security “.

The Nation­al Park Act of 1995 is a labo­ri­ous­ly achieved com­pro­mise, which nei­ther side real­ly sat­is­fies, but offers a sol­id basis for the future. The con­ser­va­tion­ists want­ed clear­er and stricter reg­u­la­tions at the time, but the traf­fic and busi­ness lob­by did not want to accept any restric­tions. This labo­ri­ous­ly won com­pro­mise should not be tak­en light­ly by hand. A new dis­pute over the nation­al park is dam­ag­ing the region.

Those who want to amend the Nation­al Park Act now basi­cal­ly want to weak­en the nation­al park, even to under­mine it com­plete­ly, so that ulti­mate­ly only the name remains as an adver­tis­ing medi­um. The Asso­ci­a­tion of Friends of the Ger­­man-Pol­ish Euro­pean Nation­al Park Unteres Oder­tal e. V. cat­e­gor­i­cal­ly reject. If it says nation­al park on it, it has to be a nation­al park. Any­one who erodes or abol­ish­es the nation­al park is wast­ing the region’s future oppor­tu­ni­ties. There­fore: hands off the nation­al park!

The board of directors